Friday Study Ministries- The First Church on the Internet


 

Go to Home Page

The Gospel of Luke
Chapter
3

Email


The Gospel of Luke Chapter Three
Commentary by Timothy H. Burdick

Luke starts out this Chapter by making reference to the fifteenth year of Tiberius when Pontius Pilate governed Judea. “Tiberius” in this reference was Tiberius Caesar, leader of the Roman Empire, who ruled from 14 AD to 37 AD. At the same time, Herod the tetrarch governed Galilee and his brother Philip was “Tetrarch of Iturea and the region of Traconitis.” The third person mentioned is Lysanias, who ruled Abilene at the time. When Herod the Great died, his kingdom was split up into fourths. Hence the title “Tetrarch,” which simply means “a ruler over a fourth.” According to historical records, we know that Herod Antipas is the same man as Herod the Tetrarch found in the New Testament.
By giving us this timeline, Luke is preparing us for John the Baptist, whose ministry began in about 29 AD. As Luke’s retelling of these incidents unfolds, John the Baptist is hearing the Voice of the Lord in a solitary place. Our world is so much more noisy then John’s was, but we can't afford to not follow his example. We must listen to the Lord. Thinking about John’s life, look with me at Psalm 46:10, which says, "be still and know that I am God; I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth."

God wants the best for you. He wants to be first, to be exalted in your life. You will never be happy in any other way. Aside from memorizing God’s Word, there is little that is more powerful then just getting alone with God. Many of the great saints of church history found their strength in silence. Again, Luke gives us a reference point. He says that all of these events took place when Annas and Caiaphas were the high priests of Israel. “Ungers Bible Dictionary” says about these two men: “Caiaphas was the son-in-law of Annas with whom he is coupled by Luke." Pastor Chuck Smith has this to say: "The Jews only had one high priest at a time. However, Annas was the high priest for a certain period of time, around 13 to 14 AD. He was then replaced by the Roman government and he was followed by three different men in the office of high priest before the Roman governor appointed Caiaphas" to that office.

John the Baptist, appears to have been a rugged individual. in Matthew 3:4, we are told some details about his lifestyle that Luke did not include. In order to get a full picture, many times it helps to study the other Gospel accounts. I think that these details provided by Luke give this character in the story flesh and bones so to speak. Matthew says, "Now John Himself had His raiment of camels hair and a leather girdle about his loins, and His food was locusts and wild honey" (Matthew 3:4).

Take note of John’s message. By baptizing, He was not just introducing a new religious ritual, he was telling his audience to repent and turn from their sin. We don't hear very much about this, but this message is just as applicable to us today. Many times, myself included (as I look back on my life), instead from turning from sin, we play with sin. We know that something in our lives isn't right, but we do it anyway. This doesn’t mean that we have to make a long list of things we can and can't do, it simply means that we need to be open and honest before God. Secondly, it dose not mean that our lives half to be dull by any means. God wants to take out of our lives only those things that aren't the best for us, the things that cause us harm.

Those of you who have children, think of it this way. Your children think that they know what is best. You try to stop them from doing something that will only hurt them. Some times they just won't listen because what they want to do seems like so much fun. Later though they regret their actions and all too often that is the way we are with God. The kind of repentance that John is talking about causes a change in heart, a change in lifestyle. Perhaps the people were asking what John’s qualifications were, in order to give out such a message.
Because in Verses 4 through 6, John the Baptist quotes from Isaiah 3:5. It says in that place, “A voice of one calling in the desert, make straight in the wilderness a highway for our God. Every valley will be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level; the rugged places a plane; and the glory of the Lord will be revealed and all mankind together will see it. For the mouth of the Lord has spoken."

The people in those days would have clearly understood what John the Baptist was saying, but in the 21st Century, our understanding may be clouded. So, let’s stop and take a look at this passage. In Biblical times, they had a herald that went before the king. This person would not only announce the king’s coming, but also prepare and make ready for him. The closest thing that this might be akin to is our secret service preparing the way for our president. By making reference to these verses found in Isaiah, John was proclaiming Himself to be that herald. But before moving on, let’s look at another application. Has your heart been prepared to meet the Lord? Have you confessed your sin and made the crooked ways in you straight? Have you sat at His feet and let him make rough places smooth? He wants to help you raise up the valleys and lower the hills in your life. In other words, what ever obstacles you are facing in your personality and in your life, He wants to help you surmount them.

It is interesting to read Luke 3:7 in conjunction with Matthew 3:5-7. Again Matthew shares certain insights which Luke does not include. People went out to John the Baptist from Jerusalem and all Judea; and the whole region of the Jordan, confessing their sins and they were baptized by Him in the Jordan river. But when John saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said, “You brood of vipers; who warned you to flee from the coming wrath?" Luke seems to lump everyone together, whereas Matthew often makes a distinction between what you might call the every day people and the religious leaders.

This is an issue of grave concern to me, as I feel that many times our so-called "leaders" are clouded in their understanding. Don't get me wrong - we need to respect our leaders, but at the same time we need to filter what say through the Word of God. If I have or if anyone else has anything to say that doesn't agree with God’s Word; get rid of it! Don't except blindly what others say. Compare the verses that we have just read with James 3:1-2. James writes, "Not many of you should presume to be teachers my brothers because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly. We all stumble in many ways. If anyone is never at fault in what he says, he is a perfect man able to keep his whole body in check."

In Luke 3:8, we hear John the Baptist returning to his original train of thought. He tells the people to produce qualities that SHOW they have really repented. Cross-reference this verse with James 2:26, where he says, "As the body without the spirit is dead so faith without works is dead also." The Jew felt that by declaring Abraham as their father, they were declaring their superiority. Because of this mindset, they felt like they could pick and choose what laws they wanted to obey. After all, weren't they God's chosen people?

Compare what John is saying in this verse with John 8:39 - "Abraham is our father they answered. “If you were Abraham’s children,” said Jesus, “then you would do the things Abraham did.” We all tend to do the same things that the Jews were doing in essence. We seem to think that because we call ourselves “Christians” that we can do anything we want to. We feel that there are no consequences and that we can say a half-hearted prayer, and all is well.

Look with me at 1 Samuel 15:22. " But Samuel replied does the Lord delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as much as in obeying the voice of the Lord? To obey is better than sacrifice and to heed is better then the fat of rams." In Galatians 6:7, Paul says, "do not be deceived God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.”
The Scripture tells us that God is no respecter of persons, which just means that He doesn’t show favoritism (Acts 10:34 and 2 Chronicles 19:7). We all therefore need to follow Abraham’s faithful example. In Luke 3:11 through 14, John the Baptist gives some pointers when it comes to living this kind of a lifestyle. First he says to share your food and clothes with those who are less fortunate. God has always made provision for those who have gone without basic needs. One example of this can be found in the little book of Ruth. Look with me at Ruth 2:2 - "And Ruth the Moabitess said to Naomi, let me go to the fields and pick up the leftover grain behind anyone in whose eyes I find favor. Naomi said go ahead my daughter.”

Next John addresses his remarks to the Roman tax collectors. They were hated by the people because of their exploitation. Whatever our position in life is, we need to decide to not take advantage of others. Compare Mark 10:43 with this passage - "Not so with you; instead whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant." In the third category, John tells the soldiers not to be violent without cause, to be honest, and also to be content with their pay. I think that we need to look at the issue of contentment. We live in a very discontented culture. We want things, but find that things don't ultimately satisfy. Look with me at first Timothy 6:6 and 7 - "But Godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into the world and we can take nothing out of it."

In verse 16, we see John talking about the baptism of the Holy Spirit and fire in reference to the One who was to come. When it comes to this subject, there has been much confusion and misunderstanding. I have been in churches that seem filled with chaos. It seemed that in this environment, the Spirit was thought to have special freedom. Compare this view with 1 Corinthians 14:3, where the apostle says, “for God is not a God of disorder; but of peace as in all the congregations of the saints." About this subject Pastor Chuck Smith says, "The fire of the Holy Spirit is always a purging fire, a cleansing fire." The Holy Spirit immerses or baptizes us into his love, while cleansing out the impurities in our lives the same way fire purifies silver and gold, giving us strength to face the challenges of life. The Spirits infilling, is always to help us lead a more Holy life.

I always get nervous when people draw to much attention to the Spirit’s work. For Jesus said about this in John 16:13 - "But when He the Spirit of Truth comes, He will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on His own; He will speak only what He hears; and He will tell you what is yet to come." Since John lived in an agricultural setting, like any good teacher he used object lessons from the physical environment to teach spiritual lessons. He used wheat and chaff to explain the characteristics of a godly and ungodly life.

In Biblical times, farmers had a shovel type instrument they called a “fan.” On a windy day, they would scoop the wheat from the threshing floor. Then they would through it up into the air, and the chaff would blow away. John the Baptist is most likely making reference to Psalm 1:4, where the psalmist says, "The wicked are not so, but are like the chaff which the wind drives away." John the Baptist continues that after the chaff was gone the wheat would be gathered into garners or silos.

Luke 3:19-20 tell us about John the Baptist rebuking Herod the King and subsequently being thrown into prison. Herod the Tetrarch was an extremely wicked man. One author says about him, "He married the daughter of Aretas king of Arabia. But later lived with Herodias the wife of his own half-brother Philip." Another author sheds some light on this by saying, "Marriage to the ex-wife of one’s brother was not uncommon, but Herodias was also the daughter of another half-brother, Aristobulus. Marriage to one’s niece was also permitted, but marriage to someone who was both one’s sister-in-law and one’s niece was unusual."

It is important that we know this background, but just as important, I feel, is studying the response of John the Baptist. John stood up for his convictions. As the saying goes, he called things like they were. There are times we need to draw on John’s example and stand up for what is right. Rather then going along with the crowd and shrinking back, we need to ask the Lord to help us press forward. Compare this verse with Acts 4:13, "When they saw the courage of Peter and John and realized that they were unschooled ordinary men, they were astonished and they took note that these men had been with Jesus."

Whatever you are going through in life, spend time with Jesus and He will give you strength to face it. It might be standing up for what is right like John did, or it might be asking for the boldness to face a physical illness. In any case, the principle is the same. In Verses 21 and 22, we have the record of Jesus’ baptism. Compare this with Matthew’s account in Matthew 3:14-17. Look at this with me: Matthew says, "But John tried to deter Him saying, ‘I need to be baptized by You and do You come to me?’ Jesus replied, ‘Let it be so now. It is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness.’ Then John consented. As soon as Jesus was baptized, He went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on Him. And a voice from heaven said, ‘This is my Son whom I love. With Him I am well pleased.’"

Both accounts clearly show the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, but there are some differences that I think will enhance the story. In Matthew’s account, we see Jesus almost pleading with John to be baptized by him. But in Luke, unlike Matthew, we see Jesus praying when He comes up out of the water. More than any other Gospel, Luke emphasized the humanity of Jesus. Before an important decision, Luke shows Jesus drawing on the power of God. John, on the other hand, concentrates on the divine nature of Christ. For example, John says, "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God" (John 1:1).

Luke 3:23-38 records the genealogy of Jesus. There is both a genealogy of Christ found in the Gospel of Matthew, and in the Gospel of Luke. If you will compare these two genealogies, you will find that Matthew starts with Jesus, the descendant of David, the descendant of Abraham. On the other hand, Luke’s genealogy is in reverse order, beginning with Adam. Hence, Luke’s genealogy has a more universal flavor. It shows that Jesus died for all men and not just a chosen few. The Bible calls Jesus the “second Adam” because just as God gave physical life through the creation of Adam, He brought spiritual life through Jesus Christ. Paul says about this, "also it is written, the first man Adam became a living soul; the last Adam became a life-giving Spirit" (1 Corinthians 15:45). To understand what Luke is saying by giving us the genealogy, we must continue to compare it with Matthew.

Matthew gives us Joseph’s genealogy, whereas Luke gives us Mary’s genealogy. Luke tells us in Verse 23, "Now Jesus Himself was about thirty years old when He began His ministry. He was the son so it was thought of Joseph,” and that word, “son,” is better translated as “son-in-law.” Joseph was the son of Heli." So, both Mary and Joseph’s sides of the family are represented. But you may ask, if Jesus was virgin born then why do we need a record of Joseph at all? Joseph’s genealogy comes through the kingly line of Solomon. See Matthew 1:6-7. It says in that place, "And Jesse the father of king David.” David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been “Uriah's wife.” “Solomon the father of Rehoboam, the father of Abijah, Abijah the father of Asa," and so on. This shows that Jesus was the first-born adopted "son" of Joseph, but He also had a right to the kingship of Israel.

But as the blood son of Mary, the genealogy of Jesus came through Nathan, another son of David. Nathan was the older brother of Solomon and the legal heir to the throne. In the Book of Jeremiah, because of the wickedness of King Jehoiachin, God put a curse on this family line. He says about this king, "This is what the Lord says, ‘Record this man as if childless; a man who will not prosper in his lifetime. For none of his offspring will prosper. None will sit on the throne of David or rule anymore in Judah" (Jeremiah 22:30). If you read Matthew’s genealogy carefully, you will find that Joseph was a descendant of this wicked king. We won't look at all the names, but as this is important look at Matthew1:11 and 12. with me. "And Josiah was the father of Jeconiah (Jehoiachin) and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon. After the exile to Babylon: Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel." Therefore, Jesus could only sit on the throne of David as the adopted son of Joseph. In conclusion, I would just like to say that the role of genealogy is central in Jewish thought and culture. It not only let the people trace their family line and tribal heritage, it also held out the hope of a long-awaited Messiah.

Friday Study Ministries
The First Church On The Net
www.FridayStudy.org
www.FirstChurchOnTheNet.org
"While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8)
_________________________________________________

To Subscribe or Unsubscribe to the weekly e-mailings of Sermons and Bible Studies from Friday Study Ministries, write to Ron@FridayStudy.org

Return to the Gospel of Luke
Return to Weekly Bulletin